Re: [PATCH] m68k: Merge mmu and non-mmu versions of sys_call_table

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:53, Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> From 5739b340b334de21c6da4f65d5194957662a6dd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 20:33:02 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] m68k: unistd - Comment out definitions for unimplemented syscalls
>
> This is not a good idea at least for the syscalls referenced by glibc.
> It means that a glibc compiled against this <asm/unistd.h> will lose the
> ability to call those syscalls even if the running kernel happens to
> implement them.

But is any of them likely to be ever implemented on m68k?
Perhaps AFS, vserver and {get,put}pmsg()?
All others seem to be old, obsolete, or i386-only.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

            Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
             Â Â -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/