Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Exclude E820_RESERVED regions and memory holesabove 4 GB from direct mapping.

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 10/20/2011 02:30 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/20/2011 02:28 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@xxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> On systems with very large memory (1 TB in our case), BIOS may report a
>>> reserved region or a hole in the E820 map, even above the 4 GB range. Exclude
>>> these from the direct mapping.
>>
>> This doesn't make much sense.  Holes above 4GB are completely legal.
>>
>> If you need to workaround a specific broken BIOS you would need a quirk
>> only matching that system, with a suitable "BIOS is broken" message.
>>
> 
> The problem is that apparently right now we map those unconditionally
> into the 1:1 map and mark them cacheable in PAT, which we *don't* for
> the < 4 GiB map.
> 
> This thus makes the behavior match < 4 GiB, which is the correct
> behavior; this should be made clear in the patch description.
> 

Specifically, it's fine for them to be mapped; it's not fine for them to
be mapped cacheable.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/