Re: [PATCH 3/3] sound/soc/au1x: keep pointer to resource so it canbe freed

[Julia Lawall]

I'm not sure how to proceed, since I originally sent 3 patches, all with 
the same problem.  I send another single patch that fixed the problems 
with nicer names than r and r1.  Should I send another single patch with 
Manuel's solution?  Or does Manuel want to do that?

julia


On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 05:47:25PM +0100, Girdwood, Liam wrote:
> > > From 940e38b3f0beff6fcd8f62f627dce622e9ca0e54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:45:12 +0200
> > > Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: au1x: fix error paths in ac97c/i2cs probe callbacks.
> > >
> > > add iounmap() and release the correct mem resource.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxx>
> 
> ...but since it was buried in the middle of the e-mail please resend
> with Liam's ack for application.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/