Re: Please include const-sections into linux-next

[James Bottomley]

On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 23:57 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> vate email?
> >
> > OK, so after fixing up that one, the next failure is:
> >
> > drivers/net/fealnx.c:95: error: version causes a section type conflict
> > drivers/net/fealnx.c:1944: error: fealnx_pci_tbl causes a section type
> > conflict
> 
> Hmm, this is weird (just like the other error)
> I wonder if the pa-risc tool chain has some general problems with sections
> 
> On a successful build with the same config could you send me the output of
> 
> make drivers/net/fealnx.s
> and
> make drivers/net/fealnx.i

> in the same config privately? From that I can see if there's something else
> in init.rodata that does not match my i386 build.

Yes, I'll send under separate cover.

> One alternative to track it down would be to apply the attached
> patch to the gcc, then gcc would print it out.

I think the basic problem that excites the toolchain somehow is
sectional annotations.  Can't we just dump them and do it all in a
linker script?  Linker scripts seem to be much better tested.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/