Re: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api

[Jassi Brar]

On 18 October 2011 23:05, Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> However, Jassi's suggestion that we redefine dma_addr_t to be 64-bit
> for just the DMA engine code is utterly insane and unworkable.  We
> can't have typedefs which change depending on which bits of code are
> being built, potentially changing the layout of structures being passed
> around inside the kernel.
>
I am not sure you understood what I meant.
When I said
     "Perhaps simply change dma_addr_t to u64 in dmaengine.h alone"
I meant
      s/dma_addr_t/u64
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/