Re: [PATCH 02/10] dmaengine: move drivers to dma_transfer_direction

[Vinod Koul]

On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 14:52 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> A general note to this rework. I haven't been cc'ed on patch 00/10,
> so, 
> replying here. Are we sure it is a good idea to name these new macros
> like 
> this:
> 
> MEM_TO_DEV,
> DEV_TO_MEM,
> ...
> 
> i.e., without a common namespace? Wouldn't something like
> DMA_DIRECTION_* 
> be better? 
Yes makes sense. I am leaning towards DMA_*

-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/