Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:766 tty_ldisc_reinit+0x52/0x90()[3.0]

From: Jiri Slaby
Date: Mon Oct 17 2011 - 16:40:40 EST


On 10/09/2011 08:59 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 08/28/2011 03:15 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Just saw this on a box that was recieving an rsync while I ssh'd in.
>>> The ssh session hung.
>>
>> Yes, could you apply the attached debug patch and post a dmesg output?
>
> I see this problem as well, the debug patch reports the refcount is 2
>
> You can produce the WARN as below:
> in xterm run:
>
> exec 0<>/dev/console 1<>/dev/console 2<>/dev/console

Thanks for the info. I suppose your console is something where also some
getty runs. Then the warning is perfectly OK. And with the hunk below
constifying timing, I guess your system dies after the 5s timeout of
tty_ldisc_wait_idle. (You don't need to test the patch, just confirm
there is a getty running on the console.)

So actually I'm not sure what we should do there to not die. Perhaps
wait infinitely? Because the user wants to steal a terminal?


--- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>

#include <asm/system.h>

@@ -1575,6 +1576,7 @@ static int n_tty_open(struct tty_struct *tty)

/* These are ugly. Currently a malloc failure here can panic */
if (!tty->read_buf) {
+ msleep(100);
tty->read_buf = kzalloc(N_TTY_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tty->read_buf)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1815,6 +1817,7 @@ do_it_again:
/* FIXME: does n_tty_set_room need locking ? */
n_tty_set_room(tty);
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
+ msleep(20);
BUG_ON(!tty->read_buf);
continue;
}


thanks,
--
js
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/