Re: [Patch] Increase USBFS Bulk Transfer size

[Alan Stern]

On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:04:28PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> > 
> > >  It would make a difference if the
> > > device violated the spec and sent 188 byte packets. However, the
> > > spec says a short packet terminates the transfer.  But I wonder
> > > if this is really the case?
> > 
> > The device does not send short packets.  If it did, the 24064-byte 
> > transfers would end early.
> 
> Re-reading the USB-2.0 standard, a short packet which terminates
> the transfer is defined by packet_size < wMaxPacketSize,
> not by packet_size < 512.
> Thus wMaxPacketSize == 188 (or 2*188) might be possible.
> 
> There is a comment in linux/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c:
> 
> 	/* The USB spec says that high speed bulk endpoints
> 	 * always use 512 byte maxpacket.  But some device
> 	 * vendors decided to ignore that, and MSFT is happy
> 	 * to help them do so.  So now people expect to use
> 	 * such nonconformant devices with Linux too; sigh.
> 	 */

That comment referred to devices with wMaxPacketSize = 1024, which has
been seen in the wild.  But other bizarre sizes are possible.

> Maybe we should look at the descriptors?

It won't hurt, although I would be quite surprised to see anything
other than 512.

Markus, can you post the output from "lsusb -v" for this inflexible 
webcam?

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/