Re: [PATCH] cgroups: don't cache common ancestor in task countersubsys

From: Ben Blum
Date: Mon Oct 17 2011 - 13:28:08 EST


On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 07:25:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 03:33:23PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > To reproduce the bug:
> >
> > # mount -t cgroup -o tasks xxx /cgroup
> > # mkdir /cgroup/tmp
> > # echo PID > /cgroup/tmp/cgroups.proc (PID has child threads)
> > # echo PID > /cgroup/tasks
> > # ecoh PID > /cgroup/tmp/cgroups.proc
> > (oops!)
> >
> > the call graph is:
> >
> > for_each_thread()
> > can_attach_task();
> >
> > for_each_thead()
> > attach_task();
> >
> > but not:
> >
> > for_each_thread() {
> > can_attach_task();
> > attach_task();
> > }
> >
> > So common_ancestor used in attach_task() is always the value calculated
> > in the last can_attach_task() call.
>
> Ah! good catch!
>
> Just a comment below:
>
> >
> > To fix it, instead of caching, we always calculate the value every time
> > we want to use it.
> >
> > Reported-by: Ben Blum <bblum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt | 3 ++-
> > include/linux/cgroup.h | 2 +-
> > kernel/cgroup.c | 7 ++++---
> > kernel/cgroup_task_counter.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> > 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt
> > index 3bc1dc9..f9e51a8 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt
> > @@ -623,7 +623,8 @@ function, so that the subsystem can implement a rollback. If not, not necessary.
> > This will be called only about subsystems whose can_attach() operation have
> > succeeded.
> >
> > -void cancel_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk)
> > +void cancel_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *oldcgrp,
> > + struct task_struct *tsk)
> > (cgroup_mutex held by caller)
> >
> > As cancel_attach, but for operations that must be cancelled once per
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > index 9c8151e..e4659c4 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ struct cgroup_subsys {
> > struct task_struct *tsk);
> > void (*cancel_attach)(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cgrp,
> > struct task_struct *tsk);
> > - void (*cancel_attach_task)(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> > + void (*cancel_attach_task)(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *oldcgrp,
> > struct task_struct *tsk);
> > void (*pre_attach)(struct cgroup *cgrp);
> > void (*attach_task)(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup *old_cgrp,
> > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> > index 018df9d..91abc9b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> > @@ -1885,7 +1885,7 @@ out:
> > break;
> >
> > if (ss->cancel_attach_task)
> > - ss->cancel_attach_task(cgrp, tsk);
> > + ss->cancel_attach_task(cgrp, oldcgrp, tsk);
> > if (ss->cancel_attach)
> > ss->cancel_attach(ss, cgrp, tsk);
> > }
> > @@ -2151,7 +2151,7 @@ int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader)
> > }
> > } else if (retval == -ESRCH) {
> > if (ss->cancel_attach_task)
> > - ss->cancel_attach_task(cgrp, tsk);
> > + ss->cancel_attach_task(cgrp, oldcgrp, tsk);
> > } else {
> > BUG_ON(1);
> > }
> > @@ -2191,7 +2191,8 @@ out_cancel_attach:
> > tsk = flex_array_get_ptr(group, i);
> > if (tsk == failed_task)
> > break;
> > - ss->cancel_attach_task(cgrp, tsk);
> > + ss->cancel_attach_task(cgrp, oldcgrp,
> > + tsk);
>
> When we rollback there, we are dealing with oldcgrp of the last thread
> we have treated. All threads in the rollback list don't necessary belonged
> to that old_cgroup.
>
> And we can't try to retrieve these old_cgroup through task_cgroup_from_root() because
> the threads might have exited and thus could be assigned to the init cgroup.
>
> I believe we need to cache these old cgroups in the flex array.
>

Doing this would fulfill the "TODO" in cgroup_attach_proc for being able
to pass the oldcgrp for each task in the loop around the ss->attach
call, so if you do that, remove the corresponding comment. :)

-- Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/