Re: [PATCH v3] dmaengine: add CSR SiRFprimaII DMAC driver

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Mon Oct 17 2011 - 11:11:19 EST


On Monday 17 October 2011, Barry Song wrote:
> >> +
> >> + /* Start the DMA transfer */
> >> + writel_relaxed(sdesc->width, sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_WIDTH_0 + cid * 4);
> >> + writel_relaxed(cid | (schan->mode << SIRFSOC_DMA_MODE_CTRL_BIT) |
> >> + (sdesc->dir << SIRFSOC_DMA_DIR_CTRL_BIT),
> >> + sdma->base + cid * 0x10 + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_CTRL);
> >> + writel_relaxed(sdesc->xlen, sdma->base + cid * 0x10 + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_XLEN);
> >> + writel_relaxed(sdesc->ylen, sdma->base + cid * 0x10 + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_YLEN);
> >> + writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_INT_EN) | (1 << cid),
> >> + sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_INT_EN);
> >> + writel(sdesc->addr >> 2, sdma->base + cid * 0x10 + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_ADDR);
> >> +
> >> + if (sdesc->cyclic) {
> >> + writel((1 << cid) | 1 << (cid + 16) |
> >> + readl_relaxed(sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_LOOP_CTRL),
> >> + sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_LOOP_CTRL);
> >> + schan->happened_cyclic = schan->completed_cyclic = 0;
> >> + }
> > any reason why we have mixed use of writel_relaxes and writel?
> > Shouldn't all the DMA register writes be done only using writel?
>
> Arnd comment this in v2.

The new version looks good to me, but a comment in the source code would
be very helpful, especially to prevent people from attempting to "fix" it
in the future.

I'm not sure about the writel/readl_relaxed in the end of that function,
because I don't understand what having a "cyclic" descriptor means.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/