Re: [PATCH] pata_atiixp: add proper ->prereset method

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

On 11-10-2011 21:55, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz<bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] pata_atiixp: add proper ->prereset method

> Fixes PCI access before PCI resources are allocated.

   Hm, didn't understand this...

> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz<bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> earlier references:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/25/320

>   drivers/ata/pata_atiixp.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

> Index: b/drivers/ata/pata_atiixp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_atiixp.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atiixp.c
[...]
> @@ -235,16 +261,7 @@ static int atiixp_init_one(struct pci_de
>   		.udma_mask = ATA_UDMA5,
>   		.port_ops =&atiixp_port_ops
>   	};
> -	static const struct pci_bits atiixp_enable_bits[] = {
> -		{ 0x48, 1, 0x01, 0x00 },
> -		{ 0x48, 1, 0x08, 0x00 }
> -	};
>   	const struct ata_port_info *ppi[] = {&info,&info };
> -	int i;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i<  2; i++)
> -		if (!pci_test_config_bits(pdev,&atiixp_enable_bits[i]))
> -			ppi[i] =&ata_dummy_port_info;

   But this seems more safe method than prereset() as it should really avoid 
accessing the disabled IDE ports (which blows up on non-x86)... didn't 
understand why this is incorrect...

WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/