Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] iommu/core: split mapping to page sizes assupported by the hardware

From: Ohad Ben-Cohen
Date: Mon Oct 10 2011 - 18:01:29 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: warn on found Change-Id lines"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] mm: memory hotplug: Check if pages are correctlyreserved on a per-section basis"
In reply to: Ohad Ben-Cohen: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] iommu/core: split mapping to page sizes assupported by the hardware"
Next in thread: Roedel, Joerg: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] iommu/core: split mapping to page sizes assupported by the hardware"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Roedel, Joerg <Joerg.Roedel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The master branch is best to base your patches on for generic work.

It looks like the master branch is missing something like this:

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: warn on found Change-Id lines"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] mm: memory hotplug: Check if pages are correctlyreserved on a per-section basis"
In reply to: Ohad Ben-Cohen: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] iommu/core: split mapping to page sizes assupported by the hardware"
Next in thread: Roedel, Joerg: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] iommu/core: split mapping to page sizes assupported by the hardware"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]