Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v9
From: Linus Walleij
Date: Mon Oct 10 2011 - 08:27:51 EST
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +The example 8x8 PGA package above will have pin numbers 0 thru 63 assigned to
>> +its physical pins. It will name the pins { A1, A2, A3 ... H6, H7, H8 } using
>> +pinctrl_register_pins_[sparse|dense]() and a suitable data set as shown
>
> It should just be pinctrl_register_pins()?
Yep, fixed it.
>> +System pinmux hogging
>> +=====================
>> +
>> +A system pinmux map entry, i.e. a pinmux setting that does not have a device
>> +associated with it, can be hogged by the core when the pin controller is
>> +registered. This means that the core will attempt to call regulator_get() and
>> +regulator_enable() on it immediately after the pin control device has been
>> +registered.
>
> s/regulator_get/pinmux_get, and s/regulator_enable/pinmux_enable
Fixed this too, sorry for being so hung up on the regulator subsystem,
must be that I really like it...
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/