Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon class driver registration with adevice number

[Alan Cox]

> AFAIK, the current sysfs interface is to read standard attributes from
> the device. My reasoning is:

and any other attributes.

> 1. This will give hwmon devices to have their "dev" in their sysfs folder
>    as like other classes and in turn be visible in /dev by mdev or udev.

Well there is in theory no reason a device shouldn't do that, but most
sysfs devices don't need to so making it generic seems odd.

> 2. Implementing IOCTL if required. I know that kernel hackers believe
>    they are "backdoors" and "can't be done right" but sometimes there
>    isn't any get away with them. I don't know when their support will
>    be completely removed. Rather, I see that instead of deprecation,
>    new IOCTL vectors like compat_ioctl have been introduced.

Certain things need ioctl, in fact some problems are *very* hard to
solve any other way: transactional updates (changing a set of fields at
once all or none), and query/response data being two.
 
> 2. During probing, for each device, call "hwmon_device_register_numbered"
>    and let mdev create a /dev node for it. I don't say that this interface
>    be imposed on drivers. If they want they can still call "hwmon_device_register"
>    if they don't want to implement standard ioctl, read, write calls.

I guess I don't see why a device that is more than just a monitoring
interface can't allocate a misc device or similar if it needs one.

For the more complex cases take a look at drivers/staging/iio also.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/