Re: [PATCH] gpio: langwell: ensure alternate function is cleared

From: Adrian Hunter
Date: Wed Oct 05 2011 - 03:52:25 EST


On 04/10/11 21:37, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:36:07PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
Alternate function must be zero for the pin to act as
a GPIO.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter<adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox<alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
index d2eb57c..00692e8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ enum GPIO_REG {
GRER, /* rising edge detect */
GFER, /* falling edge detect */
GEDR, /* edge detect result */
+ GAFR, /* alt function */
};

struct lnw_gpio {
@@ -81,6 +82,31 @@ static void __iomem *gpio_reg(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
return ptr;
}

+static void __iomem *gpio_reg_2bit(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
+ enum GPIO_REG reg_type)
+{
+ struct lnw_gpio *lnw = container_of(chip, struct lnw_gpio, chip);
+ unsigned nreg = chip->ngpio / 32;
+ u8 reg = offset / 16;
+ void __iomem *ptr;
+
+ ptr = (void __iomem *)(lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4);

This looks wrong. It looks to me like the __iomem annotation should
be added to ->reg_base.

Otherwise, the patch looks okay.


Deserves a separate patch...

From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:29:27 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: langwell: declare reg_base as __iomem

reg_base is __iomem so add that to the declaration
and fix up assignment casts and types.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
index 00692e8..b7465e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-langwell.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ enum GPIO_REG {

struct lnw_gpio {
struct gpio_chip chip;
- void *reg_base;
+ void __iomem *reg_base;
spinlock_t lock;
unsigned irq_base;
struct pci_dev *pdev;
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static void __iomem *gpio_reg(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
u8 reg = offset / 32;
void __iomem *ptr;

- ptr = (void __iomem *)(lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4);
+ ptr = lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4;
return ptr;
}

@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static void __iomem *gpio_reg_2bit(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
u8 reg = offset / 16;
void __iomem *ptr;

- ptr = (void __iomem *)(lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4);
+ ptr = lnw->reg_base + reg_type * nreg * 4 + reg * 4;
return ptr;
}

@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops lnw_gpio_pm_ops = {
static int __devinit lnw_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
const struct pci_device_id *id)
{
- void *base;
+ void __iomem *base;
int i;
resource_size_t start, len;
struct lnw_gpio *lnw;
@@ -324,8 +324,8 @@ static int __devinit lnw_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error mapping bar1\n");
goto err3;
}
- irq_base = *(u32 *)base;
- gpio_base = *((u32 *)base + 1);
+ irq_base = *(__force u32 *)base;
+ gpio_base = *((__force u32 *)base + 1);
/* release the IO mapping, since we already get the info from bar1 */
iounmap(base);
/* get the register base from bar0 */
--
1.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/