Re: [PATCH 08/30] ARM: omap2+: fix building without i2c

From: Tony Lindgren
Date: Mon Oct 03 2011 - 13:56:21 EST


* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [111003 02:15]:
> On Sunday 02 October 2011 19:31:25 Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > Nice catch. I think the bug is different, though. omap_i2c_reset should
> > never be NULL: that code is intended to execute even when
> > CONFIG_I2C_OMAP=n. The idea is to prevent the IP block from interfering
> > with the rest of the kernel even if the driver is not compiled in, no
> > matter how the bootloader or previous OS programmed the IP block.
> >
> > I'd suggest something like the following patch instead.
> >
> >
> > - Paul
> >
> > From: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 19:15:10 -0600
> > Subject: [PATCH] ARM: omap2+: fix build breakage when CONFIG_I2C_OMAP=n
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile incorrectly skips compilation of the I2C
> > IP block reset code when CONFIG_I2C_OMAP=n. Fix by unconditionally
> > compiling arch/arm/mach-omap2/i2c.o, which is needed on all OMAP2+ platforms.
> >
> > Problem noted by Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>.
>
> Ok, looks better. You should also drop patch 6 "ARM: omap: fix build with
> CONFIG_I2C_OMAP disabled" then.
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

Arnd I suggest you replace your patch with this in your branch.

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/