On Monday 03 October 2011 10:58:23 Santosh Shilimkar wrote:+config MACH_OMAP_AUTO_BOARDDo we need all above 'depends on *' ?
+ def_bool y
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP2_TUSB6010
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP_H4
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP_APOLLON
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP_APOLLON
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP_2430SDP
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP3_BEAGLE
+ depends on !MACH_DEVKIT8000
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP_LDP
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP3530_LV_SOM
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP3_TORPEDO
+ depends on !MACH_OVERO
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP3EVM
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP3517EVM
+ depends on !MACH_CRANEBOARD
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP3_PANDORA
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP3_TOUCHBOOK
+ depends on !MACH_NOKIA_N8X0
+ depends on !MACH_NOKIA_RM680
+ depends on !MACH_NOKIA_RX51
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP_ZOOM2
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP_ZOOM3
+ depends on !MACH_CM_T35
+ depends on !MACH_CM_T3517
+ depends on !MACH_IGEP0020
+ depends on !MACH_IGEP0030
+ depends on !MACH_SBC3530
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP_3630SDP
+ depends on !MACH_TI8168EVM
+ depends on !MACH_OMAP4_PANDA
Even if they get selected for one of the below
ARCH along with default machine, build should be happy.
Right ?
I'm not too happy with having to maintain a list for each subarchitecture,
when each one has the same problem. In general, I would really like to have
the flexibility to disable all but any one board, which requires either
maintaining a list like the above, or expressing the same like
config MACH_OMAP_AUTO_BOARD
def_bool y
depends on !MACH_OMAP_BOARD_SELECTED
select MACH_OMAP_GENERIC if ARCH_OMAP2
select MACH_OMAP_3430SDP if ARCH_OMAP3&& !ARCH_OMAP2
select MACH_OMAP_4430SDP if ARCH_OMAP4&& !ARCH_OMAP3&& !ARCH_OMAP2
and adding a 'select MACH_OMAP_BOARD_SELECTED' for each one. Slightly more
to write but perhaps a little less error-prone.
In the long run, I'd hope we can just get rid of these for subarchitectures
that support device tree probing and make the device tree based machine
description unconditional.