[PATCH RFC V2 1/5] jump_label: use proper atomic_t initializer
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Sat Oct 01 2011 - 17:56:30 EST
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
ATOMIC_INIT() is the proper thing to use.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/jump_label.h | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label.h b/include/linux/jump_label.h
index 66f23dc..1213e9d 100644
--- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
+++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h
@@ -28,9 +28,9 @@ struct module;
#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
-#define JUMP_LABEL_INIT {{ 0 }, NULL, NULL}
+#define JUMP_LABEL_INIT {ATOMIC_INIT(0), NULL, NULL}
#else
-#define JUMP_LABEL_INIT {{ 0 }, NULL}
+#define JUMP_LABEL_INIT {ATOMIC_INIT(0), NULL}
#endif
static __always_inline bool static_branch(struct jump_label_key *key)
--
1.7.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/