[185/244] tcp: fix validation of D-SACK

[Greg KH]

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------


From: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit f779b2d60ab95c17f1e025778ed0df3ec2f05d75 ]

D-SACK is allowed to reside below snd_una. But the corresponding check
in tcp_is_sackblock_valid() is the exact opposite. It looks like a typo.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static int tcp_is_sackblock_valid(struct
 		return 0;
 
 	/* ...Then it's D-SACK, and must reside below snd_una completely */
-	if (!after(end_seq, tp->snd_una))
+	if (after(end_seq, tp->snd_una))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (!before(start_seq, tp->undo_marker))


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/