Re: [RFD 1/9] Change cpustat fields to an array.

From: Glauber Costa
Date: Wed Sep 28 2011 - 14:21:52 EST


On 09/27/2011 06:00 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 19:20 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
/* Must have preemption disabled for this to be meaningful. */
-#define kstat_this_cpu __get_cpu_var(kstat)
+#define kstat_this_cpu this_cpu_ptr(task_group_kstat(current))

This just lost you a debug check, the former would whinge when called
without preemption, the new one wont. Its part of the this_cpu feature
set to make debugging impossible.

+#else
+#define kstat_cpu(cpu) per_cpu(kstat, cpu)
+#define kstat_this_cpu (&__get_cpu_var(kstat))
+#endif

extern unsigned long long nr_context_switches(void);

@@ -52,8 +62,8 @@ struct irq_desc;
static inline void kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(unsigned int irq,
struct irq_desc *desc)
{
- __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs[irq]);
- __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs_sum);
+ kstat_this_cpu->irqs[irq]++;
+ kstat_this_cpu->irqs_sum++;

It might be worth looking at the asm output of that, I think you made it
worse, but I'm not quite sure how smart gcc is, it might just figure out
what you meant.

I'd say leave it alone.
The biggest difference is that we don't have access to task_group(), or any of the fields in struct task_group. Because of that, we end up having to export a function to do the job of dealing with it.

Users inside sched.c won't have this problem. Outside of it, we'll add a call to some paths. True, mostly handle_irq paths, but I don't think that's what's going to kill us.

Now if we really really want to save it, we'd have to move struct task_group and its friends to a more visible location like a header...


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/