Re: [PATCH v1] sched: fix nohz idle load balancer issues

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri]

* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-09-28 10:04:27]:

> > Especially with higher number of logical CPUs. Likely cleaner way is to clear
> > first_pick, second_pick on idle instead of clearing on tickless.
> 
> I think I tried that (cleared first/second_pick_cpu in
> nohz_kick_needed() upon idle) but didn't get the best results. Let me
> try that again and post idle time numbers.

So made some changes so that first/second_pick_cpu identifiers are
cleared when corresponding cpus become idle. They are cleared in
pick_next_task_idle() ..

With that change, I don't see additional benefit of having a third busy
cpu kick ilb_cpu when it has > 1 task.


Idle time -> 			Avg.	Std.Dev   Min   Max
W/o third busy cpu kicking	4.57%   0.9	  3%    8%   
With third busy cpu kicking	4.78%   1.1%      3%    8%

So will go with your suggestion in the next version!

- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/