Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] per-cgroup tcp buffers control

From: Glauber Costa
Date: Mon Sep 26 2011 - 18:48:56 EST


On 09/26/2011 07:59 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:56:42 -0300
Glauber Costa<glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

With all the infrastructure in place, this patch implements
per-cgroup control for tcp memory pressure handling.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: David S. Miller<davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Eric W. Biederman<ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

a comment below.

+int tcp_init_cgroup(struct proto *prot, struct cgroup *cgrp,
+ struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *cg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
+ unsigned long limit;
+
+ cg->tcp_memory_pressure = 0;
+ atomic_long_set(&cg->tcp_memory_allocated, 0);
+ percpu_counter_init(&cg->tcp_sockets_allocated, 0);
+
+ limit = nr_free_buffer_pages() / 8;
+ limit = max(limit, 128UL);
+
+ cg->tcp_prot_mem[0] = sysctl_tcp_mem[0];
+ cg->tcp_prot_mem[1] = sysctl_tcp_mem[1];
+ cg->tcp_prot_mem[2] = sysctl_tcp_mem[2];
+

Then, the parameter doesn't inherit parent's one ?

I think sockets_populate should pass 'parent' and


I think you should have a function

mem_cgroup_should_inherit_parent_settings(parent)

(This is because you made this feature as a part of memcg.
please provide expected behavior.)

All right Kame, will do.
Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/