Re: [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Proposal for optimistic suspend idea.

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 12:13 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> 
> For now, I'd just be interested in what folks think about the concept with
> regards to the wakelock discussions. Where it might not be sufficient? Or
> what other disadvantages might it have? Are there any varients to this
> idea that would be better? 

I would like to know why people still think wakelocks are remotely sane?

>From where I'm sitting they're utter crap.. _WHY_ do you need to suspend
anything? What's wrong with regular idle?

So no, you've got a massive major NAK for anything touching the
scheduler for this utter braindamage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/