Re: [PATCH 4/7] nohz: Allow rcu extended quiescent state handlingseperately from tick stop

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 09:02 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Would your readability concerns be addressed by something like the
> following?
> 
> #define RCU_NO_HZ_LATER 0
> #define RCU_NO_HZ_NOW   1
> 
> Then we would have one of the following:
> 
>         tick_nohz_idle_enter(RCU_NO_HZ_LATER);
>         tick_nohz_idle_enter(RCU_NO_HZ_NOW); 

That certainly is a lot better, except for the two different ways of
collating NO HZ in that one line.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/