Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 13/26] x86: define a x86 specificexception notifier.

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 17:32 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> @@ -820,6 +821,19 @@ do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, void *unused, __u32 thread_info_flags)
>                 mce_notify_process();
>  #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 && CONFIG_X86_MCE */
>  
> +       if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_UPROBE) {
> +               clear_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> +               /*
> +                * On x86_32, do_notify_resume() gets called with
> +                * interrupts disabled. Hence enable interrupts if they
> +                * are still disabled.
> +                */
> +               local_irq_enable();
> +#endif
> +               uprobe_notify_resume(regs);
> +       }
> +
>         /* deal with pending signal delivery */
>         if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
>                 do_signal(regs); 

It would be good to remove this difference between i386 and x86_64.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/