Re: [PATCH 1/4] TTY: serial, fix locking imbalance

[Jiri Slaby]

On 09/24/2011 12:04 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:21:20PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> But if there are more trees depending on the tree, then OK, I will live
>> with that ;).
> 
> For the tty tree, I really doubt it, but I am not sure (rumor has it
> that some people are basing on it, but that might just be rumor.)

Ok, for the other uart patches I have, it would be convenient for me to
have the possibility of rebase. Would you mind if I add something like
uart-cleanup tree to the -next tree and will have the patches there
until I send them to you?

Just for the purpose of fine tuning (and rebasing) if something needs to
be fixed in them. The code is so complex, that I'm afraid I omitted some
semi-hidden dependency. And it would be great to fix patches like when I
used to work with the -mm tree.

thanks,
-- 
js
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/