Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Restore cpus_allowed mask for sleepingworkqueue rescue threads

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 09:36:57AM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> There is at least one use case where I think this can be a problem -
> cpu isolation.
> 
> If you decide to partition your CPU to give some group of processes a
> set of CPUs all to their own (using cgroups/cpuset for example) having
> non related bound processes really gets in the way. You would really
> want to migrate away non related tasks from the isolated cpuset and
> having a bound kernel thread prevents that.

Hmm... I don't think this has much to do with CPU isolation.
Workqueue rescuers are reactively invoked to resolve possible resource
deadlock.  It doesn't initiate operations on itself while CPU
isolation requires moving all sources of unwanted activites off the
isolated CPUs.  Having idle rescuers not bound to any CPU might look
prettier but wouldn't help anything - it's not an activity source and
the 'wanted' activities on the isolated CPU also require rescuers for
forward progress guarantee.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/