Re: [Bug 25832] kernel crashes when a mounted ext3/4 file systemis physically removed

[Hannes Reinecke]

On 09/20/2011 09:32 AM, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
> On 09/19/11 08:00, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[ .. ]
>>
>> There have been reports of this in Debian going back to 2.6.39:
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/631187
>> http://bugs.debian.org/636263
>> http://bugs.debian.org/642043
>>
>> Plus possibly related crashes in elv_put_request after CD-ROM removal:
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/633890
>> http://bugs.debian.org/634681
>> http://bugs.debian.org/636103
>>
>> The former was also reported in Ubuntu since their 2.6.38-10:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/linux-2.6/+bug/793796
>>
>> The result of the discussion there was that it appeared to be a
>> regression due to commit 86cbfb5607d4b81b1a993ff689bbd2addd5d3a9b 
>> ("[SCSI] put stricter guards on queue dead checks") which was also
>> included in a stable update for 2.6.38.
>>
>> There was also a report on bugzilla.kernel.org, though no-one can see
>> quite what that says now:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38842
>>
>> I also reported most of the above to James Bottomley and linux-scsi
>> nearly 2 months ago, to no response.
> 
> I've reported a similar oops related to the above commit:
>   [BUG] Oops when SCSI device under multipath is removed
>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/10/11
> 
> Elevator being removed is the core of the problem.
> And the essential issue seems 2 different models of queue/driver relation
> implied by queue_lock.
> 
> If reverting the commit is not an option,
> until somebody comes up to fix the essential issue,
> the patch below should close the regressions introduced by the commit.
> 
Why do you have to do it that complicated?
Couldn't we just state that any external lock is being disconnected from
queue_lock after blk_cleanup_queue()?

Then something like this should suffice here:

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 90e1ffd..a4ac005 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -367,10 +367,8 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q)
        queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, q);
        mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);

-       if (q->elevator)
-               elevator_exit(q->elevator);
-
-       blk_throtl_exit(q);
+       if (q->queue_lock != q->__queue_lock)
+               q->queue_lock = q->__queue_lock;

        blk_put_queue(q);
 }
diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
index 0ee17b5..a5a756b 100644
--- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
@@ -477,6 +477,11 @@ static void blk_release_queue(struct kobject *kobj)

        blk_sync_queue(q);

+       if (q->elevator)
+               elevator_exit(q->elevator);
+
+       blk_throtl_exit(q);
+
        if (rl->rq_pool)
                mempool_destroy(rl->rq_pool);


And yeah, I find it pretty annoying, too.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke              zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 NÃrnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG NÃrnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/