Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 3/26] Uprobes: register/unregisterprobes.

From: Srikar Dronamraju
Date: Wed Sep 21 2011 - 00:21:18 EST


* Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-09-20 17:50:19]:

> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 05:30:22PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > +int register_uprobe(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> > + struct uprobe_consumer *consumer)
> > +{
> > + struct uprobe *uprobe;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + inode = igrab(inode);
> > + if (!inode || !consumer || consumer->next)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (offset > inode->i_size)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> > + uprobe = alloc_uprobe(inode, offset);
> > + if (!uprobe)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> The error returns above don't iput(inode). And inode->i_mutex stays
> locked on this return.

Yes will fix this .. by clubbing the !uprobe with the next condition.
Thanks for pointing this.

>
> > +void unregister_uprobe(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> > + struct uprobe_consumer *consumer)
> > +{
> > + struct uprobe *uprobe;
> > +
> > + inode = igrab(inode);
> > + if (!inode || !consumer)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (offset > inode->i_size)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
> > + if (!uprobe)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (!del_consumer(uprobe, consumer)) {
> > + put_uprobe(uprobe);
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> More returns that do not iput(inode).

Yes. will fix these too.

--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/