Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue Sep 20 2011 - 17:02:06 EST


On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:43:29PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > > The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each
> > > > type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch,
> > > > but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should
> > > go into the same one.
> > >
> > > If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch.
> >
> > Already upstream
>
> Ok, I see. I've applied both patches to the fixes branch and will send
> it out with the next pull request for 3.1 to Linus then.

Sorry, I just noticed that the second patch is not a bug fix, so I took it out
again and kept only patch 1/2 in the fixes branch for 3.1.

Should I take the other one as well? It's probably better to let that
go the proper way through the tegra tree for 3.2, right?

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/