Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: zcache: xcfmalloc support

[Nitin Gupta]

On 09/15/2011 03:24 PM, Seth Jennings wrote:

> On 09/15/2011 12:29 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>>> From: Seth Jennings [mailto:sjenning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: zcache: xcfmalloc support
>>>


>>
>> Seth, I am still not clear why it is not possible to support
>> either allocation algorithm, selectable at runtime.  Or even
>> dynamically... use xvmalloc to store well-compressible pages
>> and xcfmalloc for poorly-compressible pages.  I understand
>> it might require some additional coding, perhaps even an
>> ugly hack or two, but it seems possible.
> 
> But why do an ugly hack if we can just use a single allocator
> that has the best overall performance for the allocation range
> the zcache requires.  Why make it more complicated that it
> needs to be?
> 
>>


I agree with Seth here: a mix of different allocators for the (small)
range of sizes which zcache requires, looks like a bad idea to me.
Maintaining two allocators is a pain and this will also complicate
future plans like compaction etc.

Thanks,
Nitin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/