Re: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10000002

[Christian Hoffmann]

On 09/10/2011 09:58 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:17:53PM +0200, Christian Hoffmann wrote:
> > On 09/10/2011 06:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Christian Hoffmann
> > > <email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I can see the following bug report in the kernel 3.1 rc5 dmesg:
> > > >
> > > > [    0.000008] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10000002
> > > > [    0.000012] Modules linked in:
> > > > [    0.000015] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.1.0-rc5-ch+ #2
> > > > [    0.000017] Call Trace:
> > > > [    0.000024]  [<ffffffff81052cb6>] __schedule_bug+0x66/0x70
> > > > [    0.000028]  [<ffffffff8160329d>] schedule+0x99d/0x9b0
> > > > [    0.000032]  [<ffffffff81cf22b5>] ? pidmap_init+0x9f/0xdf
> > > > [    0.000035]  [<ffffffff8105cc7a>] __cond_resched+0x2a/0x40
> > > > [    0.000038]  [<ffffffff81603541>] _cond_resched+0x31/0x40
> > > > [    0.000041]  [<ffffffff8115fb63>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x53/0x160
> > > > [    0.000043]  [<ffffffff81cf22b5>] pidmap_init+0x9f/0xdf
> > > > [    0.000046]  [<ffffffff81cd9b8a>] start_kernel+0x333/0x3c8
> > > > [    0.000049]  [<ffffffff81cd9347>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x132/0x136
> > > > [    0.000051]  [<ffffffff81cd944c>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x101/0x110
> > >
> > > Paul McKenney has a patch that solves this oops.  You can find it here:
> > >
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131537669921538&w=2
> > >
> > > We had discussed getting this into 3.1, but apparently that didn't
> > > happen (yet?).  I thought it had been sent upstream with my tested-by,
> > > but I don't see it included in Linus' tree.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the patch up there doesn't seem to apply cleanly to 3.1 rc5, as it
> > misses the rename done in "[PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/55] rcu: Simplify
> > quiescent-state accounting"
> > (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131537654621392&w=2).
>
> For 3.1-rc5, you will be wanting this one:
>
> 	https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/19/355

Hi,

yes, this applies and makes the stack disappear.

Thanks,
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/