Re: [PATCH 12/62] m64k: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED

[Yong Zhang]

On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:05:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 05:18, Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 07/09/11 18:10, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >>
> >> This flag is a NOOP and can be removed now.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Looks ok to me:
> >
> > Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Except for the subject, it's m68k, not m64k ;-)

Sorry for the typo.

> 
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Sorry, I missed the introductary email [0/62].

I sent it out, but seems it didn't reach LKML due to the compromise
of kernel.org.

> But do you expect the individual
> maintainers to take these patches, or are you just collecting Acks?

Quoted from Thomas's reply to Ralf (MIPS):
[ We can hold off the "remove the define" patch until 3.2-rc1 and push
it along with everything which hasn't been merged until then.

Alternatively I can pick the whole MIPS bunch as well. I let Ralf
decide. ]

So the same rule here, you can decide it :)

Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/