Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: omap: convert per-board modules to platformdrivers

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:59:04PM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:01:02AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:47:31PM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > What will happen for device tree is that there will be a device in the
> > > device tree for the ASoC board.
> 
> > Sounds like you just solved the machine_is_xxx() problem in ASoC land too
> > there.  If you're _already_ going for separate devices to describe the
> > ASoC stuff on the board, then there's no reason that couldn't have already
> > been done to eliminate the machine_is_xxx() usage in ASoC - rather than
> > complaining about machine_is_xxx() not being a very good solution.
> 
> The problem is that someone has to manually go and add the device to
> every board that needs one and people find that tedious and slightly
> inelegant

Sheesh.  So now you're arguing against your statement above?  Please
stop wasting my time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/