Re: [RFC] [PATCH 02/62] mpu401:snd_mpu401_uart_new(): split semanticof irq_flags

[Clemens Ladisch]

Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:58:45PM +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > ...
> > Here, "no interrupt" and "already reserved" actually mean the same thing,
> > i.e., that the interrupt handling is the responsibility of some other
> > driver.

Sorry, after checking the code, I've realized that my description was
wrong.  irq_flags==0 ("already reserved") means that snd_mpu401_uart_new
should not try to allocate the interrupt, while irq==-1 ("no interrupt")
means that the device never issues mpu401 interrupts, so that the mpu401
code must use a timer to poll the device.

I'll write a patch that changes this function so that irq<0 means
"already reserved", and that "no interrupt" gets another bit in the
info_flags parameter.


Regards,
Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/