Re: [PATCH pm-freezer 1/4] cgroup_freezer: fix freezer->statesetting bug in freezer_change_state()

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Fri Sep 02 2011 - 13:09:03 EST


Hello,

On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > This still doesn't look quite right. If the cgroup is FREEZING it should
> > also call try_to_freeze_cgroup(). I think this is what's needed:
> >
> > if (freezer->state == CGROUP_THAWED)
> > atomic_inc(&system_freezing_cnt);
> > freezer->state = CGROUP_FREEZING;
> > retval = try_to_freeze_cgroup(cgroup, freezer);
>
> This is what I mentioned before, to me this looks like a win.
>
> Why do we need try_to_freeze_cgroup() in this case? "for safety"
> could actually mean "hide the bug" ;)

I guess it depends on the viewpoint. A simple analogy would be using
WARN_ON_ONCE() instead of BUG_ON() so that the mode of failure is
softer. This change isn't likely to make bugs significantly more
difficult to discover so why not?

> But I agree either way. Rafael, I think 1-4 are fine, but I think
> we need the simple 5/4, will send in a minute...

Can you please wait a bit? The second one was broken (missing unlock)
and I made some small adjustments. Will repost soon.

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/