Re: 3.0-git15 Atomic scheduling in pidmap_init

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:02:19PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 03:49:16PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 06:37:35PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 08:20:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:04:17AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > > > Please see the attached.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fixed it up quickly to apply on top of -rc2 and it seems to solve the
> > > > > problem nicely.  Thanks for the patch.
> > > > 
> > > > Good to hear!  I guess I should keep it, then.  ;-)
> > > 
> > > Hey Paul, were you going to send this to Linus for -rc3?  I haven't seen
> > > it come across LKML yet.
> > 
> > I might...  But does it qualify as a regression?  That part of the
> > code hasn't changed for some time now.
> 
> It's a fix for a problem that is newly surfaced in 3.1.  A regression,
> likely not since it's been there forever, but new debugging options
> uncovered it.  I'm pretty sure the -rc stage takes fixes even if they
> aren't regressions.

Nope, after -rc1 only regressions fixes are taken (most of the time).

> 
> josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/