Re: [PATCH 00/41] signal: Use set_current_blocked()

[Matt Fleming]

On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 18:03 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 
> I'll try to read this carefully on weekend though. I do not expect I'll
> find any problem, just may be a couple of nits about the changelogs.
> Say, 41/41... doesn't hurt, but in fact the current code is fine as is.

Thanks for the review Oleg! Did you want me to send just the updated
versions of patches or the entire series again? It would seem over the
top to send the entire series.

Also, are you going to pull these patches into your tree and send them
to Linus or would it be better to route them through -mm?

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/