Re: [RFC PATCH]vhost-blk: In-kernel accelerator for virtio blockdevice

[Badari Pulavarty]

Hi Liu Yuan,

I am glad to see that you started looking at vhost-blk.   I did an 
attempt year ago to improve block
performance using vhost-blk approach.

http://lwn.net/Articles/379864/
http://lwn.net/Articles/382543/

I will take a closer look at your patchset to find differences and 
similarities.

- I focused on using vfs interfaces in the kernel, so that I can use it 
for file-backed devices.
Our use-case scenario is mostly file-backed images.

- In few cases, virtio-blk did outperform vhost-blk -- which was counter 
intuitive - but
couldn't exactly nail down. why ?

- I had to implement my own threads for parellism. I see that you are 
using aio infrastructure
to get around it.

- In our high scale performance testing, what we found is block-backed 
device performance is
pretty close to bare-metal (91% of bare-metal). vhost-blk didn't add any 
major benefits to it.
I am curious on your performance analysis & data on where you see the 
gains and why ?

Hence I prioritized my work low :(

Now that you are interested in driving this, I am happy to work with you 
and see what
vhost-blk brings to the tables. (even if helps us improve virtio-blk).

Thanks,
Badari


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/