Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for headerchange

[Dave Jones]

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 04:01:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
 > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:48:02AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
 > >  > Some header change has removed an implicit include of module.h, breaking
 > >  > the build due to the use of THIS_MODULE. Fix that.
 > 
 > > is this dependant on the module.h changes that just got merged in -next
 > > from Paul Gortmaker ?  If so, it should probably get merged as part of that set.
 > 
 > Possibly, but there were a bunch of other failures in the Samsung
 > specific stuff not related to module.h which appeared today. I did run
 > into another non-samsung module.h failure, though.  Mostly I was just
 > surprised stuff like this was showing up so late in the merge window, I
 > didn't spend a lot of time investigating what broke.

wait, confused. Were you building Linus' tree, or -next ?

	Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/