Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.0-rc7 (sound/isa/)

[Randy Dunlap]

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:17:09 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi Randy,
> 
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:13:20 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:10:03 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:37:53 +0200 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > 
> > > > At Sun, 24 Jul 2011 12:26:24 -0700,
> > > > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:33:30 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/ad1816a/ad1816a_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_disable':  => 544
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/ad1816a/ad1816a_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer':  => 302
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/ad1816a/ad1816a_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program':  => 244
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/es1688/es1688_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer':  => 509
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/es1688/es1688_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program':  => 417
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/gus/gus_dma.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_disable':  => 177
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/gus/gus_dma.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program':  => 79
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/gus/gus_pcm.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer':  => 619
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/gus/gus_pcm.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program':  => 591
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/sb/sb16_main.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer':  => 456
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/sb/sb16_main.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program':  => 276
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/sb/sb8_main.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer':  => 425
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/sb/sb8_main.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program':  => 172
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/sscape.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program':  => 481
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/wss/wss_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_disable':  => 1695
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/wss/wss_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_pointer':  => 1160
> > > > > >   + src/sound/isa/wss/wss_lib.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_dma_program':  => 1025
> > > > > 
> > > > > All of these source files do #include <sound/core.h>,
> > > > > but these missing/implicit functions are conditional:
> > > > > 
> > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API
> > > > > #define DMA_MODE_NO_ENABLE	0x0100
> > > > > 
> > > > > void snd_dma_program(unsigned long dma, unsigned long addr, unsigned int size, unsigned short mode);
> > > > > void snd_dma_disable(unsigned long dma);
> > > > > unsigned int snd_dma_pointer(unsigned long dma, unsigned int size);
> > > > > #endif
> > > > > 
> > > > > so should these drivers all depend on ISA_DMA_API ?
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, these are ISA sound cards, so they must have CONFIG_ISA and
> > > > CONFIG_ISA_DMA.  Although CONFIG_SND_SB8_DSP, CONFIG_SND_SB16_DSP
> > > > and CONFIG_SND_WSS_LIB have no direct dependency, but the drivers
> > > > selecting these are all in "if SND_ISA" in sound/isa/Kconfig.
> > > 
> > > Hm, yes, they are.
> > > 
> > > > > or should only pieces of each driver depend on ISA_DMA_API ?
> > > > 
> > > > I wonder which configuration makes it possible.
> > > > Did you see a similar problem with randconfig?
> > > 
> > > No.  This parisc allmodconfig file from linux-next builds has
> > > CONFIG_SND_ISA=y but it does not have CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API enabled.  Weird.
> > > 
> > > Geert, do you know how this happens?
> > > 
> > > parisc config:  http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/4323458/config/
> > > from this failed build:  http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/4323458/
> > 
> > How is CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API enabled in parisc allmodconfig?
> > I don't see how that happens, and it's causing build errors...
> 
> Sorry, but I don't understand the question.  The problam is that
> CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API is not enabled, right?  On parisc, it is just (from
> arch/parisc/Kconfig)
> 
> config ISA_DMA_API
> 	bool
> 
> and nothing selects it.  However, I would have expected an allmodconfig
> to set it to y.  Clearly I don't understan how allmodconfig works any
> more :-(
> 
> Michal, is my understanding correct?  Is this a bug in allmodconfig?

When I do:
$ make ARCH=parisc O=PAR allmodconfig

I don't get CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API enabled, so the question is simply
how is the linux-next build system ending up with CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API enabled?
What commands are used to cause this?


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/