Re: [PATCH 03/25] dynamic_debug: use pr_debug instead of pr_info

[Bart Van Assche]

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Changing pr_info() into pr_debug() inside the dynamic_debug
>> implementation seems like a really bad idea to me. Such changes make
>> it hard to find out via source code reading whether or not there is a
>> risk that invoking one of these pr_debug() macros will cause infinite
>> recursion.
>
> WRT earlier discussion (Joe, Jason):
>
>> I think these should be pr_debug.
>> I know you're only using the current style.
>>
>> Jason, any reason these can not be converted?
>
> it should be ok, although we have to be careful not to use them in the
> printing path, since that will cause a recursion.
>
> Also, if there is an issue with the dynamic debug code, it makes it more
> of a pain to debug :)

With this approach enabling all debug printing in the dynamic_debug
implementation requires both echoing into .../dynamic_debug/control
and setting the "verbose" module parameter. That's not something I
would call "elegant", but after all, I'm not the dynamic debug
maintainer ...

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/