Re: [PATCH] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:16:56PM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Is it possible to derive the bit positions (and the need to mask them) 
> >> from the cpuid description of the cache topology and sizes?
> > 
> > As far as I understand your question, there's no need for deriving the
> > bit positions because they're not special. You just have to have bits
> > [14:12] the same across all processes - we simply opted for clearing
> > them in order to keep the patch as simple as possible. But we could just
> > as well hashed the library name and generated the bits from it and thus
> > keep them same per library (we have that version too, btw. :)).
> > 
> > FWIW, in both cases, the patch should fix even the virtualization
> > scenario with and without KSM.
> > 
> > Does that answer your question?
> > 
> 
> I think the question was the width (and position) for the mask... i.e.
> your [14:12] above which *is* magic.

Oh, that's easy: family 15h means bits [14:12] - those bits are used for
I$ index generation.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/