[PATCH tip:x86/memblock RFC] powerpc: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP

[Tejun Heo]

powerpc doesn't access early_node_map[] directly and enabling
HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is trivial - replacing add_active_range() calls
with memblock_set_node() and selecting HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is
enough.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
benh, the proposed memblock changes are now in tip:x86/memblock, which
is probably scheduled for the next merge window.  This patch converts
powerpc to drop early_node_map[] and put NUMA information in memblock.
I'm planning on converting all early_node_map[] users and dropping the
code.  I don't have access to ppc NUMA machine so the patch is tested
only on a non-NUMA SMP machine.  It builds fine for all valid
combinations of of 32/64 [!]SMP [!]NUMA.

If this change is okay, how should this patch be routed?  ppc tree
pulls from x86/memblock and puts this patch on top of it?

Thanks.

 arch/powerpc/Kconfig   |    1 +
 arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c  |    2 +-
 arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c |   10 ++++------
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: work/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- work.orig/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ work/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ config PPC
 	select HAVE_KRETPROBES
 	select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
 	select HAVE_MEMBLOCK
+	select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
 	select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS
 	select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG
 	select USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS if SMP
Index: work/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
+++ work/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ void __init do_init_bootmem(void)
 		unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
 		start_pfn = memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg);
 		end_pfn = memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg);
-		add_active_range(0, start_pfn, end_pfn);
+		memblock_set_node(0, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX, 0);
 	}
 
 	/* Add all physical memory to the bootmem map, mark each area
Index: work/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ work/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -680,9 +680,7 @@ static void __init parse_drconf_memory(s
 			node_set_online(nid);
 			sz = numa_enforce_memory_limit(base, size);
 			if (sz)
-				add_active_range(nid, base >> PAGE_SHIFT,
-						 (base >> PAGE_SHIFT)
-						 + (sz >> PAGE_SHIFT));
+				memblock_set_node(base, sz, nid);
 		} while (--ranges);
 	}
 }
@@ -772,8 +770,7 @@ new_range:
 				continue;
 		}
 
-		add_active_range(nid, start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
-				(start >> PAGE_SHIFT) + (size >> PAGE_SHIFT));
+		memblock_set_node(start, size, nid);
 
 		if (--ranges)
 			goto new_range;
@@ -808,7 +805,8 @@ static void __init setup_nonnuma(void)
 		end_pfn = memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg);
 
 		fake_numa_create_new_node(end_pfn, &nid);
-		add_active_range(nid, start_pfn, end_pfn);
+		memblock_set_node(PFN_PHYS(start_pfn),
+				  PFN_PHYS(end_pfn - start_pfn), nid);
 		node_set_online(nid);
 	}
 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/