Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: strict rq_affinity

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:59:39PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Some storage controllers benefit from completions always being steered
> to the strict requester cpu rather than the looser "per-socket" steering
> that blk_cpu_to_group() attempts by default.

Isn't this actually dependent on the cpu, and not the storage
controller?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/