Re: [PATCH] iMX28: Fix emi_ddr_open pinmux

From: Marek Vasut
Date: Thu Jul 21 2011 - 15:44:23 EST


On Thursday, July 21, 2011 09:05:36 PM Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 06:08:10PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-mx28.h | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-mx28.h
> > b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-mx28.h index f50fefd..1a95ecd
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-mx28.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-mx28.h
> > @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@
> >
> > #define MX28_PAD_EMI_WEN__EMI_WEN MXS_IOMUX_PAD_NAKED(6, 21,
> > PAD_MUXSEL_0) #define
> > MX28_PAD_EMI_CE0N__EMI_CE0N MXS_IOMUX_PAD_NAKED(6, 22,
PAD_MUXSEL_0)
> > #define MX28_PAD_EMI_CE1N__EMI_CE1N MXS_IOMUX_PAD_NAKED(6, 23,
> > PAD_MUXSEL_0)
> >
> > -#define MX28_PAD_EMI_CKE__EMI_CKE MXS_IOMUX_PAD_NAKED(6, 24,
> > PAD_MUXSEL_0) +#define
> > MX28_PAD_EMI_CKE__EMI_CKE MXS_IOMUX_PAD_NAKED(6, 26,
PAD_MUXSEL_0)
>
> In my version of the i.MX28 Reference Manual (Rev. 1, 2010) pin24 is
> correct. So if you're still convinced that 26 is correct you should point
> out in the commit log that the Reference Manual is wrong and why you're
> convinced it really is.

Scrap this, you're right.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/