Re: [PATCH rcu/urgent 0/6] Fixes for RCU/scheduler/irq-threads trainwreck

From: Ben Greear
Date: Wed Jul 20 2011 - 13:04:30 EST


On 07/20/2011 06:34 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:03:05PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:07:32PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Tuesday 19 July 2011 21:30:00 Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Tuesday 19 July 2011 20:17:38 Paul E. McKenney wrote:

Paul,

Two things to add. Its possible an eariler error is missing from the log below. My serial console was missing
entries from before '0 and 40ish' and I did think I saw a bunch of FFFFFFFs scroll by eariler...

Second, booting with threadirqs and boost enabled in .config with patches 2,5,6 is ok so far.

Patches 3 and 4 resulted in failures? (Patch 1 certainly did.)

Gaah. Any possibility of getting this resolved soon?

I believe that we are very close. These failures all involve unusual
configurations, which is why they showed up so late.

What is strange about my configuration? Just that I enabled the
RCU boost and other new RCU features?

Surely it's not that I'm just doing lots of mounts and unmounts
and file-io with lots of processes....

And I was posting lockdep warnings on this since -rc1 or so, though granted
I was running a few extra patches and having other bugs at the same time....

Thanks,
Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/