Re: [PATCH 01/34] System Firmware Interface
From: Prarit Bhargava
Date: Tue Jul 19 2011 - 09:40:25 EST
On 07/19/2011 09:21 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:05:44AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> Could you expand somewhat WHY you want this. What is wrong with the
>>> current code?
>> See the previous discussions
> Ok I will put that now as description into all my code submissions @)
> Seriously, that REALLY belongs into a patch description.
I can certainly do that on the next version. Sorry about that Andi.
>>> As for user space access on x86 "dmidecode"/libdmi works for nearly everyone,
>>> doesn't it?
>> "on x86" (and on PC only generally)
>> There are three core problems
>> 1. DMI in this sense is basically an x86 PC class device hack
>> 2. It is obsoleted and at some point it'll vanish even on PC
> Huh? What obsoleted it?
The DMI specification has not been updated since January of 2003. It
has been replaced by SMBIOS.
>> 3. Every other platform without DMI would benefit from the
>> interface being generic
> Can you expand on that? The information will be always system
> specific anyways. Do you really think there's that much commonality?
There seems to be some commonalities. We have other arches checking for
model and vendor info.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/