Re: [PATCH 2/2] lib: call native hex_to_bin() inside _kstrtoull()

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Mon Jul 18 2011 - 06:40:23 EST


On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 13:31 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > --- a/lib/kstrtox.c
> > +++ b/lib/kstrtox.c
> > @@ -39,25 +39,18 @@ static int _kstrtoull(const char *s, unsigned int base, unsigned long long *res)
> > acc = 0;
> > ok = 0;
> > while (*s) {
> > - unsigned int val;
> > + int val;
> >
> > - if ('0' <= *s && *s <= '9')
> > - val = *s - '0';
> > - else if ('a' <= TOLOWER(*s) && TOLOWER(*s) <= 'f')
> > - val = TOLOWER(*s) - 'a' + 10;
> > - else if (*s == '\n' && *(s + 1) == '\0')
> > + if (unlikely(*s == '\n' && *(s + 1) == '\0'))
> > break;
> > - else
> > - return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - if (val >= base)
> > + val = hex_to_bin(*s++);
> > + if (val >= base || val < 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > if (acc > div_u64(ULLONG_MAX - val, base))
> > return -ERANGE;
> > acc = acc * base + val;
> > ok = 1;
> > -
> > - s++;
> > }
> > if (!ok)
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> 1. unlikely() and s++ move don't have anything to do with changes
That's true. I remove those changes.

> 2. I don't understand desire to use some half-thought out API,
> in fact, restricting to radix 16 is arbitrary.
> Without such restriction hex_to_bin doesn't make sense.
I doubt I get it. hex_to_bin validates its input indirectly. The
behaviour of your code (without changes mentioned in 1.) is the same.

--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/