Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ext4: Ignore a stripe width of 1

From: Eric Sandeen
Date: Fri Jul 15 2011 - 17:47:27 EST


On 7/15/11 4:41 PM, Dan Ehrenberg wrote:
> If the stripe width was set to 1, then this patch will ignore
> that stripe width and ext4 will act as if the stripe width
> were 0 with respect to optimizing allocations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Ehrenberg <dehrenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, I think this makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 9ea71aa..0a3745b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -2383,17 +2383,27 @@ static unsigned long ext4_get_stripe_size(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
> unsigned long stride = le16_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_raid_stride);
> unsigned long stripe_width =
> le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_raid_stripe_width);
> + int ret;
>
> if (sbi->s_stripe && sbi->s_stripe <= sbi->s_blocks_per_group)
> - return sbi->s_stripe;
> + ret = sbi->s_stripe;
>
> - if (stripe_width <= sbi->s_blocks_per_group)
> - return stripe_width;
> + else if (stripe_width <= sbi->s_blocks_per_group)
> + ret = stripe_width;
>
> - if (stride <= sbi->s_blocks_per_group)
> - return stride;
> + else if (stride <= sbi->s_blocks_per_group)
> + ret = stride;
> + else
> + ret = 0;
>
> - return 0;
> + /*
> + * If the stripe width is 1, this makes no sense and
> + * we set it to 0 to turn off stripe handling code.
> + */
> + if (ret <= 1)
> + ret = 0;
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /* sysfs supprt */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/